Comments on: Google Magazine: Neat Concept http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/ Sharing ideas and innovation. Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:05:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: factor http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-273 factor Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:08:56 +0000 http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-273 yea i saw that amazon kindle product. im not sold... aside from the fact that its hideous, cant they just create an appplication for blackberry or iphones that does the same thing and is much more practical for them and their consumer??? yea i saw that amazon kindle product. im not sold… aside from the fact that its hideous, cant they just create an appplication for blackberry or iphones that does the same thing and is much more practical for them and their consumer???

]]> By: tito http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-271 tito Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:33:01 +0000 http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-271 Also this product has vast implications for the text book market for schools. Also this product has vast implications for the text book market for schools.

]]> By: tito http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-270 tito Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:30:38 +0000 http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-270 Amazon released an interesting product today which is basically a eBook product similar to Sony's portable reader. Amazon's product isnt pretty but it makes a lot of sense for them, as they can leverage their virtual book inventory (Amazon has spent considerable time and money to digitize its book especially for previewing) while connecting to already vast customer base. The major differentiator from similar products is Amazon created a distribution system to deliver to book thru cellular or wireless networks so you can always purchase books on demand. Though not optimal for all situations, this would a nice treat on a plane as this light device can replace several heavy book or magazines. Cost about $400 http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/amazon-pitches-a-wireless-ipod-for-books/index.html?ref=business http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=11038811 Amazon released an interesting product today which is basically a eBook product similar to Sony’s portable reader. Amazon’s product isnt pretty but it makes a lot of sense for them, as they can leverage their virtual book inventory (Amazon has spent considerable time and money to digitize its book especially for previewing) while connecting to already vast customer base. The major differentiator from similar products is Amazon created a distribution system to deliver to book thru cellular or wireless networks so you can always purchase books on demand. Though not optimal for all situations, this would a nice treat on a plane as this light device can replace several heavy book or magazines. Cost about $400

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/amazon-pitches-a-wireless-ipod-for-books/index.html?ref=business

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=11038811

]]> By: correlate http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-268 correlate Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:44:18 +0000 http://www.incubaker.com/tank/2007/11/google-magazine-neat-concept/#comment-268 <strong>Print is back?...</strong> Not that it was ever gone, people often still like to read off the computer whether it be a newspaper, magazine, book or whitepaper (anyone try reading an entire research report online?, it is tough). And a patent filed in 1996 may not tell us one way... Print is back?…

Not that it was ever gone, people often still like to read off the computer whether it be a newspaper, magazine, book or whitepaper (anyone try reading an entire research report online?, it is tough). And a patent filed in 1996 may not tell us one way…

]]>